I find the various claims for the existence of a god or gods to be unconvincing, at least so far. It's possible there's a convincing case which I've yet to hear of course.
My position is that I don't know for certain, but I think the existence of a god or gods is very improbable, and I live my life on the assumption that they are not there. But of course, it is possible that a god or gods exist. I am not claiming that there is no God and if anyone makes that claim, they have the burden of proof.
There are a whole range of gods being proposed by various religions. Maybe some of these gods are more probable than others. But how to measure this subjective idea?
I've devised a methodology which shows that in my opinion, the most improbable god hypotheses are Jehovah's Witness, Mormonism and Christianity (96% to 98% improbable) and the least improbable are Taoism, Jainism, Deism at about 71%.
In other words, pantheism and deism explain the facts of reality much more convincingly than monotheism. Interestingly, Unitarian Universalism which I consider to be a category of Christianity, scores almost as highly as pantheism.
This is the complete table - the methodology is described underneath the table. But note! This is essentially subjective. All I'm providing is some structure to the thinking - not proof!
METHOD
Step 1: Provide a list of facts about reality which can be used as a basis of measurement. I've identified 15 facts (listed in column 1 of the table)
Step 2: identify the major religions and their attributes. I've used the table provided here as the definitive snapshot of each religion.
Step 3: Assess each religion against each fact with a score from 0 to 2 where 0 contradicts the facts, 1 neither contradicts or explains, and 2 provides some kind of explanation.
Step 4: Calculate the total for each religion, then subtract from 100 to get a percentage.
No comments:
Post a Comment