During
a debate on a religion discussion board (which I was not even
participating in!) A Creationist compared me to Lt Columbo...
“JimC
loves playing the Columbo! It's all meant to distract, obfuscate, and
keep discussions off-balance. He's the master of unintelligibility.”
This is of course a gross misrepresentation of Columbo - but being compared to the great man is a massive compliment - Columbo is one of my favourite fictional characters and always has been. I bought a box set of the
Complete Columbo about 6 months ago and watching an episode during a
lazy afternoon is a treat I never get tied of.
Now, it's
obvious A Creationist didn't mean it as a compliment but as I've mentioned before, religious apologists are often hoist by their own
petard when they use analogies, and this is another example.
Columbo
was a genius. His opponents were of course also extremely clever, but
delusional, arrogant, living a lie, hiding the truth behind a facade of
smugness, confidence, authority and respectability.
“There
must be something wrong with me. I seem to bother people, make them
nervous”
Especially
people with something to hide.
Columbo
had an instinct for quickly spotting a charlatan. But he wouldn't
rely on his intuition: he'd work diligently and politely to establish the facts, gather the
evidence. And he'd get the evidence simply by asking questions,
so the liars would expose themselves, their ever more contrived
answers and excuses causing their stories to unravel. He would give
them the rope with which they would hang themselves.
“I'm
just here to ask you a few questions sir.”
On
a few occasions, when Columbo's opponents realised they had run out
of answers to his questions, when his “just one more thing” was
the last straw and they knew the game was up, they would
attack him, even try to kill him. But he always anticipated this, and would be prepared
and handle the situation calmly.
Columbo
was always one step ahead of the frauds and liars he was exposing. And they couldn't see it until it was too late.
“Just
one more thing...”
Peter
Falk sums it up well in his autobiography...
"I
was struck very early on by the dramatic possibilities of playing a
man who housed within himself two opposite traits. On the one hand
being a regular Joe, the guy next door, nothing special, and at the
same time being the most brilliant detective on the globe. A guy with
a mind like Einstein who sounded like the box boy at Food Giant".
"Another
thing I realised about him – appearing intelligent made him uneasy
– it put him at a disadvantage. He was much more comfortable
looking a bit slow – it was relaxing for him to give the impression
of mediocrity. He knew he had you where he wanted you."
No comments:
Post a Comment